DEBBIE ELLIOTT, HOST:

3M has reached a agreement over what had been referred to as perpetually chemical compounds. The chemical producer has agreed to pay a minimum of $10.3 billion to settle complaints over doubtlessly damaging compounds that do not degrade simply. 3M is a number one maker of PFAS – chemical compounds that experience infected lots of the country’s public ingesting water programs, partly on account of such things as firefighting foam.

SCOTT SUMMY: They offered it to airports and hearth coaching amenities around the nation, they usually informed them that they had to be coaching with it. And so they did. And so they skilled with it per 30 days. They’d set one thing deliberately on hearth after which use the froth to position it out. And since those chemical compounds actually reside perpetually and don’t damage down, the ones compounds get into the bottom and into the groundwater.

ELLIOTT: Scott Summy is without doubt one of the lawyers representing the water programs that sued 3M and different producers. I requested him how his shoppers have reacted to this agreement.

SUMMY: So the water programs that I constitute are situated around the nation. They serve public ingesting water. However sadly, like many public water programs around the nation, they’re dealing with PFAS within the ingesting water. And they have got been very all for it since the EPA has put out proposed ingesting water requirements that may take impact in different years. And methods to agree to them is those water programs have to put in dear water remedy to be able to take away the chemical compounds earlier than the water is served to the general public. So upon listening to about this agreement, clearly the shoppers are more than pleased as a result of they have got been very all for how they will fund this remedy. And this agreement being the biggest ingesting water agreement in American historical past will pass a ways in serving to them fund that remedy.

ELLIOTT: So PFAS had been connected to well being issues starting from liver harm to a couple cancers. Do you assume this agreement is going a long way sufficient? Is it going to be sufficient cash to mend the issue?

SUMMY: Clearly, to take away PFAS from public water programs around the nation is an drastically dear undertaking. Sadly for 3M, they’re the biggest marketplace player amongst all of the producers. However the issue is, is that their marketplace cap is best about 55 billion and this agreement may have them pay as much as 12.5 billion. And so it is a massive bite. It is clearly a compromise. However for our shoppers, it is – you recognize, it is higher than the opposite of looking to chase them for the following 10 years in a court docket.

ELLIOTT: , is there a tradeoff there, even though? Scientists are discovering those chemical compounds far and wide now – in meals, in flora and fauna, in people. A tribulation would have introduced roughly higher consciousness to the issue.

SUMMY: Sure, however trials are dear. They are dangerous. And, you recognize, for my shoppers – they are now not – you recognize, the towns and cities throughout The united states – they are now not within the trade of litigating. They’re within the trade of working their cities and serving water. And so they in reality simply sought after to give you the option to get help in getting them remedy for his or her ingesting water. Now, do not overlook, within the multidistrict litigation the place these kinds of circumstances have been pending, there are lots of, many, many circumstances left. There are millions of private damage circumstances. There are lawyer common fits. There are assets harm circumstances. So there really well is also trials coming.

ELLIOTT: So that is just the start.

SUMMY: That is the start.

ELLIOTT: Lawyer Scott Summy. His shoppers gained a $10 billion agreement settlement from 3M over ingesting water contamination involving the chemical compounds PFAS.

SUMMY: Thank you for having me.

Copyright © 2023 NPR. All rights reserved. Talk over with our site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.

NPR transcripts are created on a hurry time limit via an NPR contractor. This article is probably not in its ultimate shape and is also up to date or revised someday. Accuracy and availability would possibly range. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.